I am running a CentOS 8 Stream server in a factory filled with Windows clients and need to resolve their hostnames from the IPs that access my server. I am not running any networking services on my server: that is handled by our corporate I.T. "professionals". Unfortunately, their DHCP/DNS system (Windows DCs) does not propagate changes very well and I have intermittent problems with nslookup finding the hostnames. Nslookup on the Windows systems do not seem to have this problem. I am running out-of-the box DHCP-based networking with NetworkManager on the LAN, but it is a high availability, 2-node cluster with a second, private network for corosync and DRBD communications that is static. The LAN interface is used for the server's virtual IP, as well as all other network communications via its DHCP-assigned IP.
The DHCP server has supplied my server with four nameserver IPs and I have found that if I try all of them, I eventually get a hostname for the IP, but which nameserver works is often not the first in the DHCP-supplied list (contents of resolv.conf) and, apparently, the resolver on CentOS 8 is only checking the first nameserver that responds (?) and if that server does not have the IP, it does not resolve. Is there a way to configure my server to keep trying name servers until it either has tried them all or gets a hostname? I use nslookup for my scripts and testing, but I need the OS to be able to resolve a hostname so apps I don't have control over can also resolve the hostname. Does NetworkManager have a command or configuration setting to enable this?
How to use all nameservers in resolv.conf
Re: How to use all nameservers in resolv.conf
The details of how it works are in man resolv.conf and yes, any answer at all from a nameserver, even if it's "dunno that" counts as a correct response. There are options you can specify, maybe some of those will help. The real answer is to get a nameserver that works.
CentOS 8 died a premature death at the end of 2021 - migrate to Rocky/Alma/OEL/Springdale ASAP.
Info for USB installs on http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/InstallFromUSBkey
CentOS 5 and 6 are dead, do not use them.
Use the FAQ Luke
Info for USB installs on http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/InstallFromUSBkey
CentOS 5 and 6 are dead, do not use them.
Use the FAQ Luke
Re: How to use all nameservers in resolv.conf
The default resolver in glibc reads only three nameserver entries.
I have added config file /etc/NetworkManager/conf.d/00-dns.conf on my systems and it has:
If I would need to change config of that dnsmasq instance (that Networkmanager.service starts),
I would add a config file to /etc/NetworkManager/dnsmasq.d/
(One of the other resolvers listed for option 'dns' could be better, but I was semi-familiar with dnsmasq.)
Yes, the dns config option. See man NetworkManager.conf for possible values.davewithheld wrote: ↑2022/11/23 22:06:50Does NetworkManager have a command or configuration setting to enable this?
I have added config file /etc/NetworkManager/conf.d/00-dns.conf on my systems and it has:
Code: Select all
# ansible #
[main]
dns=dnsmasq
I would add a config file to /etc/NetworkManager/dnsmasq.d/
(One of the other resolvers listed for option 'dns' could be better, but I was semi-familiar with dnsmasq.)
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 2022/08/13 04:43:08
Re: How to use all nameservers in resolv.conf
google searches have indicated that dnsmasq is the only solution, but I would like to avoid adding yet another (non-trivial) service to a cluster that needs to be kept identical on both nodes. I have a workaround in place, now, that maintains resolv.conf independent of NetworkManager/DHCP and would rather stick with this simpler system. Thanks anyway.
Re: How to use all nameservers in resolv.conf
Simpler? You still have to configure the NetworkManager so that it does not modify the resolv.conf and you have to do that "on both nodes". That requires about as much work as the "dns=dnsmasq".
If you desire to keep multiple machines with "identical" config, then I strongly recommend taking into use one of the configuration management systems. My config revealed that I do use Ansible, but there are others too. For example, Chef and Puppet.
If you desire to keep multiple machines with "identical" config, then I strongly recommend taking into use one of the configuration management systems. My config revealed that I do use Ansible, but there are others too. For example, Chef and Puppet.