OpenSSL CVE-2016-2176, CVE-2016-2178

Support for security such as Firewalls and securing linux
Post Reply
paulmancan
Posts: 26
Joined: 2005/07/01 15:16:51

OpenSSL CVE-2016-2176, CVE-2016-2178

Post by paulmancan » 2016/08/24 19:06:06

Vuln scanning is detecting these. I do not see back ported patches noted.

RHN reports on these two seem ambiguous.

Are these legitimate vulnerabilities?


Thanks!

User avatar
avij
Retired Moderator
Posts: 3046
Joined: 2010/12/01 19:25:52
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Contact:

Re: OpenSSL CVE-2016-2176, CVE-2016-2178

Post by avij » 2016/08/24 19:13:22

CVE-2016-2176: "not affected" https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2016-2176

CVE-2016-2178: "fix deferred" https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2016-2178 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cg ... -2016-2178 -- I interpret this as "a fix will be included in the next convenient release of openssl, but there's no rush".

paulmancan
Posts: 26
Joined: 2005/07/01 15:16:51

Re: OpenSSL CVE-2016-2176, CVE-2016-2178

Post by paulmancan » 2016/08/24 19:41:19

Thanks that was what I saw too but felt that this was ambiguous " in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h " Centos 7 be on 1.0.1e so.... just the way I read this errata I guess?

User avatar
avij
Retired Moderator
Posts: 3046
Joined: 2010/12/01 19:25:52
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Contact:

Re: OpenSSL CVE-2016-2176, CVE-2016-2178

Post by avij » 2016/08/24 19:50:42

For -2176: "OpenSSL packages distributed by Red Hat do not enable EBCDIC support and are therefore unaffected by this issue.", so even though the version matches, the vulnerable functionality is not enabled in the packages distributed by Red Hat / CentOS.

For -2178: Yes, the RH / CentOS version is vulnerable, but its low severity does not warrant an immediate update.

paulmancan
Posts: 26
Joined: 2005/07/01 15:16:51

Re: OpenSSL CVE-2016-2176, CVE-2016-2178

Post by paulmancan » 2016/08/24 20:12:18

Awesome thanks for your quick reply!

Post Reply