Here's the current list of identified, unpatched CentOS 4 vulnerabilities:
1 Aug 11 bugzilla@redhat.com [RHSA-2010:0625-01] Moderate: wireshark security update
2 Aug 5 bugzilla@redhat.com [RHSA-2010:0606-01] Important: kernel security and bug fix update
2 Jul 23 bugzilla@redhat.com [RHSA-2010:0557-01] Critical: seamonkey security update
4 Jun 15 bugzilla@redhat.com [RHSA-2010:0474-01] Important: kernel security and bug fix update
5 Jun 7 bugzilla@redhat.com [RHSA-2010:0459-01] Moderate: openoffice.org security update
Sam
CentOS 4 i386 Updates Delayed?
- AlanBartlett
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 9327
- Joined: 2007/10/22 11:30:09
- Location: ~/Earth/UK/England/Suffolk
- Contact:
Re: CentOS 4 i386 Updates Delayed?
Thanks for the latest update to the list, [b]Sam[/b].
[b]toracat[/b] -- It's your turn to purr, with menaces, into a [i]C-dev[/i]'s ear. ;-)
[b]toracat[/b] -- It's your turn to purr, with menaces, into a [i]C-dev[/i]'s ear. ;-)
Re: CentOS 4 i386 Updates Delayed?
Alan and Toracat and everyone else...thanks for all your help. Tru seems to be back on the case :-)
I think it's probably OK to archive this thread.
Sam
I think it's probably OK to archive this thread.
Sam
- AlanBartlett
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 9327
- Joined: 2007/10/22 11:30:09
- Location: ~/Earth/UK/England/Suffolk
- Contact:
Re: CentOS 4 i386 Updates Delayed?
Yes, it's true (excuse the pun), [b]Tru[/b] now has a working DSL line and is clearing the back-log.
[quote]
I think it's probably OK to archive this thread.
[/quote]
Agreed. I'll just [i]un-sticky[/i] it and then we can let it decay away with time. ;-)
[quote]
I think it's probably OK to archive this thread.
[/quote]
Agreed. I'll just [i]un-sticky[/i] it and then we can let it decay away with time. ;-)