Search found 32783 matches
- 2024/03/18 23:19:55
- Forum: CentOS 7 - General Support
- Topic: httpd24-httpd-2.4.34-23.el7.6 SCLO never built?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 48
Re: httpd24-httpd-2.4.34-23.el7.6 SCLO never built?
I've asked the main CentOS 7 dev about this but have yet to receive an answer. However, this package is not part of the main CentOS repos and things from the centos-sclo-rh used to be built by the CentOS SCL SIG and I am not sure that exists any more. We'll find out in a day or 6 what the answer may...
- 2024/03/17 18:59:09
- Forum: User Comments
- Topic: Is CentOS really going EOL?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 92
Re: Is CentOS really going EOL?
Correct. It would seem that you haven't been paying attention - Red Hat announced at the end of 2020 that they were canning the CentOS project as-was and replacing it with "CentOS Stream" which is a permanent beta product in which RH test fixes that will be in the _next_ version of RHEL. Those are o...
- 2024/03/15 21:55:46
- Forum: CentOS 7 - Software Support
- Topic: Failed to start Name Service Cache Daemon
- Replies: 5
- Views: 302
Re: Failed to start Name Service Cache Daemon
OK, so try the opposite direction, where does nscd come from?
rpm -qf /usr/sbin/nscd
yum list nscd --showdupli
rpm -qf /usr/sbin/nscd
yum list nscd --showdupli
- 2024/03/15 19:16:50
- Forum: CentOS 7 - Software Support
- Topic: Failed to start Name Service Cache Daemon
- Replies: 5
- Views: 302
Re: Failed to start Name Service Cache Daemon
Startup Log Mar 14 18:26:46 server.fooweb.com nscd[31800]: /usr/sbin/nscd: relocation error: /usr/sbin/nscd: symbol __nss_database_lookup2, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference This looks like someone has either installed a version of nscd that is not part of...
- 2024/03/15 14:45:06
- Forum: 8 /8-Stream / 9-Stream - Hardware Support
- Topic: Should I buy Intel Core i5-1340P for CentOS?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 397
Re: Should I buy Intel Core i5-1340P for CentOS?
I run AMD graphics on both my systems here, both F38 with kernel 6.7.5 and 6.7.6. I did have problems recently with crashes in amdgpu but that turned out to be due to my ATEN KVM having been reset to factory defaults and turning on a setting for MST. Once reset to SST the crashes have gone away but ...
- 2024/03/15 13:40:31
- Forum: 8 /8-Stream / 9-Stream - Hardware Support
- Topic: Should I buy Intel Core i5-1340P for CentOS?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 397
Re: Should I buy Intel Core i5-1340P for CentOS?
I run Fedora 38 (now 39) on my Dell XPS13 Plus 9320 and that has an i5-1340P. I have not noticed any problems with it. And Fedora is rockl solid, not sure when you last tried it but I've been running it now since F32 and in that time I've had maybe 2 problems that were caused by Fedora and one of th...
- 2024/03/14 15:22:56
- Forum: 8 /8-Stream / 9-Stream - General Support
- Topic: failed boot
- Replies: 3
- Views: 258
Re: failed boot
Not sure how much simpler it gets. You're left at an emergency shell there. From that `mount -o remount,rw /` then edit /etc/fstab and fix whatever is wrong in it, save it, reboot.
- 2024/03/14 13:15:36
- Forum: 8 /8-Stream / 9-Stream - General Support
- Topic: failed boot
- Replies: 3
- Views: 258
Re: failed boot
Looks like something in your /etc/fstab is not mountable. If you `mount -o remount,rw /` then you can edit /etc/fstab from a rescuer boot and fix it.
- 2024/03/13 12:11:47
- Forum: 8 /8-Stream / 9-Stream - General Support
- Topic: [Closed] RHEL 9 - single kernel option at boot
- Replies: 26
- Views: 1852
Re: RHEL 9 - single kernel option at boot
Well the good news is that LVM LVs are still there so now all you need to do is work out why they are not accessible from the newer kernels. Boot one and try to mount /home manually and see what the error is. Check using pvs/vgs/lvs to see if the LVM PV/VG/LVs are all visible. Check /var/log/message...
- 2024/03/13 11:09:39
- Forum: 8 /8-Stream / 9-Stream - General Support
- Topic: [Closed] RHEL 9 - single kernel option at boot
- Replies: 26
- Views: 1852
Re: RHEL 9 - single kernel option at boot
Since these "disappeared" just after you edited /etc/fstab I would check to make sure you didn't fat finger something in there that you didn't intend to.