For whatever unknown reason, that update built on 12/4/2021 along with the other arches, but it was not released.
It has been pushed to the master server now and will be available on mirror.centos.org in 30 or so minutes.
Search found 129 matches
- 2022/03/08 22:55:29
- Forum: CentOS 7 - Security Support
- Topic: missing arm64 packages fixing nss (CVE-2021-43527)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1602
- 2022/02/14 13:44:49
- Forum: 8 /8-Stream / 9-Stream - General Support
- Topic: Boot fails after update ipmi_si No such device
- Replies: 7
- Views: 10394
Re: Boot fails after update ipmi_si No such device
The issue of "missing ipmi_si" is not the reason for the boot failure. This is an issue for sure, but whatever is happening next the boot sequence is causing your boot failure. To fix specifically the "ipmi_si No such device" error, you can blacklist the module and remove from your initrd image the ...
- 2021/06/11 14:26:33
- Forum: CentOS 7 - General Support
- Topic: ibus-1.5.17-12 i686 updates are missing
- Replies: 1
- Views: 976
Re: ibus-1.5.17-12 i686 updates are missing
Thanks for the report. I have fixed this on our internal mirror and when I do the update release later today, the new ibus.i686 rpms will go out as well.
- 2020/04/22 15:29:55
- Forum: CentOS 7 - Security Support
- Topic: sgabios SRPM in CentOS 7 Sources repo signed with VirtSIG instead of CentOS7 key
- Replies: 2
- Views: 768
Re: sgabios SRPM in CentOS 7 Sources repo signed with VirtSIG instead of CentOS7 key
OK .. i fixed this in the 7.8.2003 tree. It seems the virt sig also also built the same ENVR (they shouild not do that) .. and when moving during a point release we got the wrong srpm as they have the same name.
Once we release 7.8.2003 (in the next few days) it will be fixed.
Once we release 7.8.2003 (in the next few days) it will be fixed.
- 2019/07/09 16:00:40
- Forum: CentOS Social
- Topic: CentOS 8 AltArch (32-bit Intel)
- Replies: 18
- Views: 15032
Re: CentOS 8 AltArch (32-bit Intel)
We are not planing to release i386 for CentOS-8. There will be 32-bit multilib packages but not an i386 release. At least that is the plan and will be what happens at the beginning. As with anything else .. if enough people need this arch and if we can make it work, it could be possible in the futur...
- 2019/03/27 12:56:23
- Forum: CentOS 7 - Security Support
- Topic: CESA for CVE-2019-5736 runc and docker updates?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1506
Re: CESA for CVE-2019-5736 runc and docker updates?
We only announce updates for the Base repositories, not the extras repositories. runc and docker are in Extras.
- 2019/01/08 21:23:04
- Forum: CentOS 7 - Hardware Support
- Topic: NVIDIA Optimus and bumblebee on Lenovo ThinkPad P51
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6821
Re: NVIDIA Optimus and bumblebee on Lenovo ThinkPad P51
I am looking at this info .. I want to use the NVIDIA drivers on the ThinkPad P51. It seems that the driving factor for the version you selected (NVIDIA-Linux-x86-390.87.run) and then also the same x86_64 version was it is the latest x86 32 bit version supported. Is that indeed the reason this versi...
- 2018/12/04 20:02:00
- Forum: CentOS 7 - General Support
- Topic: golang package missing from centos/7.6.1810
- Replies: 16
- Views: 9685
Re: golang package missing from centos/7.6.1810
OK .. I kicked off the copy. In about an hour or so .. os/x86_64/ (updates, extras, etc.) will populate in http://vault.centos.org/centos/7.5.1804/
You can use it from there as long as you like.
You can use it from there as long as you like.
- 2018/12/04 19:57:44
- Forum: CentOS 7 - General Support
- Topic: golang package missing from centos/7.6.1810
- Replies: 16
- Views: 9685
Re: golang package missing from centos/7.6.1810
Let me go ahead and copy the 7.5.1804 tree into vault. then you can add that repo to your yum config
- 2018/12/04 19:38:41
- Forum: CentOS 7 - General Support
- Topic: golang package missing from centos/7.6.1810
- Replies: 16
- Views: 9685
Re: golang package missing from centos/7.6.1810
If you look, in the Red Hat repo you will see kernels from 7.0. CentOS does not have that either. If you wanted to use the 7.0 kerel, you would need to go to http://vault.centos.org/centos/ to get it .. it is the same for anything else that RH removed from their 'Current' tree. It was removed from 7...