Search found 241 matches

by hughesjr
2019/07/09 16:00:40
Forum: CentOS Social
Topic: CentOS 8 AltArch (32-bit Intel)
Replies: 18
Views: 5500

Re: CentOS 8 AltArch (32-bit Intel)

We are not planing to release i386 for CentOS-8. There will be 32-bit multilib packages but not an i386 release. At least that is the plan and will be what happens at the beginning. As with anything else .. if enough people need this arch and if we can make it work, it could be possible in the futur...
by hughesjr
2019/03/27 12:56:23
Forum: CentOS 7 - Security Support
Topic: CESA for CVE-2019-5736 runc and docker updates?
Replies: 2
Views: 859

Re: CESA for CVE-2019-5736 runc and docker updates?

We only announce updates for the Base repositories, not the extras repositories. runc and docker are in Extras.
by hughesjr
2019/01/08 21:23:04
Forum: CentOS 7 - Hardware Support
Topic: NVIDIA Optimus and bumblebee on Lenovo ThinkPad P51
Replies: 5
Views: 4927

Re: NVIDIA Optimus and bumblebee on Lenovo ThinkPad P51

I am looking at this info .. I want to use the NVIDIA drivers on the ThinkPad P51. It seems that the driving factor for the version you selected (NVIDIA-Linux-x86-390.87.run) and then also the same x86_64 version was it is the latest x86 32 bit version supported. Is that indeed the reason this versi...
by hughesjr
2018/12/04 20:02:00
Forum: CentOS 7 - General Support
Topic: golang package missing from centos/7.6.1810
Replies: 16
Views: 5303

Re: golang package missing from centos/7.6.1810

OK .. I kicked off the copy. In about an hour or so .. os/x86_64/ (updates, extras, etc.) will populate in http://vault.centos.org/centos/7.5.1804/

You can use it from there as long as you like.
by hughesjr
2018/12/04 19:57:44
Forum: CentOS 7 - General Support
Topic: golang package missing from centos/7.6.1810
Replies: 16
Views: 5303

Re: golang package missing from centos/7.6.1810

Let me go ahead and copy the 7.5.1804 tree into vault. then you can add that repo to your yum config
by hughesjr
2018/12/04 19:38:41
Forum: CentOS 7 - General Support
Topic: golang package missing from centos/7.6.1810
Replies: 16
Views: 5303

Re: golang package missing from centos/7.6.1810

If you look, in the Red Hat repo you will see kernels from 7.0. CentOS does not have that either. If you wanted to use the 7.0 kerel, you would need to go to http://vault.centos.org/centos/ to get it .. it is the same for anything else that RH removed from their 'Current' tree. It was removed from 7...
by hughesjr
2018/10/17 13:38:38
Forum: CentOS 7 - Security Support
Topic: On Aarch64 - Secure Boot Enable Kernel is Signing Is Support ?
Replies: 2
Views: 801

Re: On Aarch64 - Secure Boot Enable Kernel is Signing Is Support ?

No, we do not plan on using secureboot on aarch64 at this time. It is possible to make it happen, however the aarch64 builders are not currently 'physically' located in a place where we can use the secureboot key with that build system. It may be possible at some point in the future, but it is not o...
by hughesjr
2018/10/15 17:22:35
Forum: CentOS 7 - Software Support
Topic: Firefox ate my saved logins :-(
Replies: 26
Views: 2588

Re: Firefox ate my saved logins :-(

Red Hat has an update in testing: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1633932#c23 There are temporary (unsigned) files here for CentOS 6 and CentOS 7 (x86_64, i386): https://buildlogs.centos.org/c6-firefox60.x86_64/firefox/20181015143830/ https://buildlogs.centos.org/c7-firefox60.x86_64/fire...
by hughesjr
2018/08/28 12:37:55
Forum: CentOS 7 - Software Support
Topic: CentOS7.5 Update Repo 20.9.2018 doubled rpms
Replies: 3
Views: 580

Re: CentOS7.5 Update Repo 20.9.2018 doubled rpms

Thanks for the question.

I found the issue (they released those two updates to the c7-alt tree .. our builder built them for the c7 tree).

I am fixing the issue now and will change some scripting to prevent it in the future.
by hughesjr
2017/06/05 17:13:58
Forum: CentOS 7 - Software Support
Topic: RT kernel build issue if RT_BASIC is enabled
Replies: 10
Views: 1898

Re: RT kernel build issue if RT_BASIC is enabled

BTW, I built the kernel config as it comes from Red Hat sources, for the RT kernel. I assume that is the way they build it as well. If you modify the config file for a different (unsupported by them for RHEL) option, I'm not sure why you would expect that build.

Go to advanced search